Sunday, 1 July 2012

A Midsummer Night’s Dream (Lecture 25/6/12)

WOMEN'S ROLES

This was my first encounter with William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream and was also my first time reading a Shakespearean comedy. In my experience with Greek theatre, I have learned that the most important difference between a comedy and a tragedy is the outcome of the play; if it is a tragedy, it ends badly for the protagonist and if it is a comedy, it ends with the protagonist in improved circumstances. Despite being a comedy, I noted that there were several elements more common to tragedy present throughout the play. The play begins with Theseus and Hippolyta’s discussion of their wedding day, which introduces the subject matter of love and marriage. Through their discourse, Shakespeare also alludes to one of the tragic elements of the play – the helplessness of women to control the path of their own lives. Theseus tells Hippolyta, “I wooed thee with my sword,/And won thy love doing thee injuries,” which informs the audience that he captured her in conquest of the Amazons and that her marriage to him is not by choice (16-17). Hippolyta only has a small speaking role in this play. She is a woman without agency or a strong voice, so we never learn her feelings about her forced marriage to Theseus. Her muted role in the play reflects the nature of her suppression and lack of agency.
In class I learned that Hippolyta and Theseus are often thought to mirror the Queen and King of Fairies, Titania and Oberon. While Theseus rules the realm of Athens as Duke with his soon-to-be wife and Queen of the Amazons, Hippolyta, Oberon and Titania rule the magical and fantastical dreamlike realm. While Hippolyta is relatively silent, Titania has a strong speaking role in this play. Despite this distinction, she is also controlled and ultimately subjugated by her husband. She represents the limitations of women’s power over their own motherhood and sexuality in marriage. When her servant dies in childbirth, Titania raises the son the servant left behind. The fate of Titania’s adopted son comprises her chief conflict with Oberon. While Titania wants to continue to raise the boy on her terms, Oberon desires to make the boy his “page of honor.” When Titania refuses, Oberon overrules her by shaming her and mocking her sexuality. He orders Robin Goodfellow the puck to magically transform Bottom the weaver’s head into an ass’s head. Robin is then asked to place a potion on Titania’s eyes under which she will fall in love with ass-headed Bottom. These events provide ample humor for the play, but they are also important because they result in Titania’s submission to Oberon’s will. On one hand, Titania’s sexual encounter with ass-headed Bottom reflects Oberon’s control of her sexuality. Shakespeare originally presents Titania and Oberon as sexually equivalent figures through their parallel affairs with engaged couple Hippolyta and Theseus. Titania loses this equivalency, however, when Oberon mocks her sexuality by magically forcing her to have sex with a mutant donkey-man. In addition to gaining control over her sexuality, Oberon uses this trickery to obtain Titania’s foster son. He refuses to release Titania from her humiliating trance until he achieves this victory. Oberon presents us with a vivid image of her disgrace in the moment that he discovers her winding flowers around the hairy temples of Bottom, at which point he taunts her with pleasure. This humiliating image conveys a mockery of female power and sexuality. The scene reflects the wife’s submission to the desires of the husband, which was certainly expected and even legally required in a sense in Shakespeare’s England. As Oberon conquers Titania and forces her to submit to his will, Theseus physically conquers Hippolyta in battle and forces her to marry him. These parallel characters reflect the distribution of power and control in marriage in 1590s England.
Significantly, the women who do acquire the men they love are only able to do so because of magic. Through the fantastical elements of the play, Shakespeare creates a space where women have the ability to determine their fates. Shakespeare creates Hippolyta and parallel character Titania to contrast to the happy fates of Helena and Hermia. Hippolyta and Titania’s lack of control over their destinies reflects the lack of agency borne by women in Shakespeare’s England. In contrast, Helena is able to marry the man she loves, Demetrius, and Hermia is able to marry the man she loves, Lysander, because of a powerful love potion distributed on Oberon’s orders. At the onset of the play, Hermia’s father, Egeus, seeks Theseus’ help to force his daughter to marry Demetrius. Hermia and Lysander are in love and Helena is in love with Demetrius, who has apparently had some sort of undisclosed romantic relations with her before seeking Hermia’s hand in marriage. Theseus determines that Hermia must marry Demetrius or choose to die for her disobedience. Theseus’ ruling on Hermia and Demetrius’ marriage further reflects women’s lack of control over their own fates. But in this case, magic provides the female lovers with an opportunity to control their destinies. The magical potion that results in Demetrius’ newfound affections for Helena allows the women to have the husbands of their choosing.
However, this outcome comes at a price: the questionable legitimacy of Demetrius’ love for Helena. In class, we debated the role of the potion. While some argued that Demetrius’ love for Helena was forced and false, I argued that the potion gave Demetrius the push he needed to see Helena in a new light but that he ultimately had loved her all along. This is supported by the allusions to their past romantic affair. If I adopt the opposing view, then the outcome of the play simply reflects a reversal of gender roles in which the man is forced into a marriage rather than the woman. But I believe that my understanding of the events reflects the outcome that is best for all, including Demetrius. Demetrius’ engagement with Hermia was sought out of superficial desires whereas his relationship with Helena was preexisting and will most likely result in a happier marriage. Shakespeare’s magic allows the lovers to break political and social barriers and find happiness in one another. They could only find this happiness through magic, which reflects the real-world unlikeliness that women could significantly alter the paths of their courtships and marriage in 1590s England.

Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed.
Stephen Greenblatt. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009. 189-246.
Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment